Derek,

     It's not a question of difficulty of implementation, I'm just  
asking if you think anyone will use it for generic build-outs.

Regards,
Ken

On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:18 PM, Derek Richardson wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:08 PM, KennethMiller <xkenneth@...>  
> wrote:
>> Just to spark a bit of discussion:
>>
>>   I want to make my time as useful as possible, so I don't want to  
>> waste time coding for unneeded features. Recently I've been  
>> questioning the usefulness of the buildoutbuilder as a generic  
>> buildout configuration tool. I see the tools main functionality  
>> being distributing the pre-configured and configuring plone- 
>> specific buildouts. I'd really like to spend as much time as  
>> possible making this an excellent tool. Let me know what you think.
>
> I have no problem with plone-specific, but am curious what
> difficulties make it more efficient to focus on plone than develop a
> generic tool. What features would a generic tool need that a plone
> tool doesn't?
>
> Derek
>
>
> --
> Archive: http://www.openplans.org/projects/buildoutbuilder/lists/buildoutbuilder-discussion/archive/2008/06/1214266747074
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to buildoutbuilder-discussion@... 
> .  Please contact buildoutbuilder-discussion-manager@... 
>  for questions.
>