Rob Miller <robm@...> writes:

> okay, everyone's made their opinions clear, no problem.  the bottom
> line, though, is that there will be migration code in the remember
> product.  i'm planning, early next week, to repurpose the migration
> code that's currently in personalities as a part of the remember core,
> probably making a few changes in the process.

I understand you want everything related to remember to go the way you
want it to go and that sometimes it's difficut to play with others.
It's just a shame you find it necessary to override the wishes of
authors of code you find valuable, especially when there are plenty of
more cooperative options on the table.  I wish I had been given a
chance to respond to any specific problem cases you might have come up
with that might have demonstrated what was actually wrong with what I
proposed.  I hope you'll at least properly cite authorship in any code
you incorporate.

> i won't touch personalities, though, per ross's request.  i'll leave
> the existing migration code in there, even though it will have become
> redundant (and will possibly be interfering with the other code) at
> that point.

I haven't requested that you don't touch personalities.  Please feel
free to make contributions to personalities.  And if you're going to
leverage your weight to override my wishes for my migration code, then
please feel free to make commits that disable any code that conflicts
with your changes to prevent personalities from breaking.  Just do so
without *removing* any code.  At any rate, I certainly do wish for you
or anyone else who wishes to make contributions to "touch"
personalities.

> if you reconsider, ross, my offer to remove the migration code from
> personalities all at the same time still stands.

Thank you for your generous offer.

Onward!  :)

Ross