Ross Patterson wrote:
> Rob Miller <robm@...> writes:
> 
>>>> i won't touch personalities, though, per ross's request.  i'll leave
>>>> the existing migration code in there, even though it will have become
>>>> redundant (and will possibly be interfering with the other code) at
>>>> that point.
>>> I haven't requested that you don't touch personalities.  Please feel
>>> free to make contributions to personalities.  And if you're going to
>>> leverage your weight to override my wishes for my migration code, then
>>> please feel free to make commits that disable any code that conflicts
>>> with your changes to prevent personalities from breaking.  Just do so
>>> without *removing* any code.  At any rate, I certainly do wish for you
>>> or anyone else who wishes to make contributions to "touch"
>>> personalities.
>> when you say to do so w/o removing any code, does this mean that you
>> want me to leave the vestigial (i.e. unexecuted) code in the product?
>> you'd rather have it come down in an svn checkout, even though it
>> should never be run, than have the product only contain actual working
>> code?  you know that the history is still preserved in the svn repo,
>> right?
> 
> I wanted you to do as I asked, leave the code in there.  You deleted
> the files.  Please restore them.  Yes I am aware of the capabilities
> of svn, but please reverse your deletions of
> personalities/trunk/Extensions/cmfmember.py and
> personalities/trunk/migration in tunk.  Thank you.

sorry, i honestly forgot that you had requested this.  i'm still at a loss as 
to why.

-r