Hold on, I use 0.95 for all my stuff. I've never even bothered to 
download the nightly build. Is there THAT much difference?

Huw

Douglas Mayle wrote:
> I'm amenable to this, as it has changed greatly since 0.95.  I think 
> both 1.0 and 2.0 are big steps, and have slightly different 
> connotation.  1oseems more like a, "Hey Everybody, Xinha is ready" 
> kind of a version, while 2.0 says to me, "This is already stable 
> software we're adjusting our numbering to reflect reality".  I know 
> that's an awful lot to read from a number, but that's kind of how I 
> see it.  I'm not sure which is the correct one to go with, though...
>
> Doug
>
>
> On Nov 19, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Raimund Meyer wrote:
>
>> I have been thinking about calling the next version 1.0 or even 2.0 
>> (to be bold) instead of 0.96 to reflect our recent advancement. What 
>> do you think?
>>
>> ray
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Archive: 
>> http://www.openplans.org/projects/xinha/lists/xinha-discussion/archive/2008/11/1227122139743 
>>
>> To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to 
>> xinha-discussion@....  Please contact 
>> xinha-discussion-manager@... for questions.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Archive: 
> http://www.openplans.org/projects/xinha/lists/xinha-discussion/archive/2008/11/1227132288977 
>
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to 
> xinha-discussion@....  Please contact 
> xinha-discussion-manager@... for questions.
>

Excerpts from Douglas Mayle's message of Wed Nov 19 17:04:47 -0500 2008:
> I'm amenable to this, as it has changed greatly since 0.95.  I think  
> both 1.0 and 2.0 are big steps, and have slightly different  
> connotation.  1.0 seems more like a, "Hey Everybody, Xinha is ready"  
> kind of a version, while 2.0 says to me, "This is already stable  
> software we're adjusting our numbering to reflect reality".  I know  
> that's an awful lot to read from a number, but that's kind of how I  
> see it.  I'm not sure which is the correct one to go with, though...
> 

While I agree that changing the version to 0.96 fails to convey the significance of the update, I'm a slightly wary of jumping to 1.0, mostly because I think there are still too many known issues with Xinha. But I'm not strongly against moving straight to 1.0, so if others do feel strongly, I'm ok with it. Otherwise I'd say we should stick with 0.96, and then after the release decide on some key things we want to get done and set out on the road to 1.0. 

So, my vote is for either 0.96 or 1.0 (definitely not 2.0).

-Nick


However, 
> Doug
> 
> On Nov 19, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Raimund Meyer wrote:
> 
> > I have been thinking about calling the next version 1.0 or even 2.0  
> > (to be bold) instead of 0.96 to reflect our recent advancement. What  
> > do you think?
> >
> > ray
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Archive: http://www.openplans.org/projects/xinha/lists/xinha-discussion/archive/2008/11/1227122139743
> > To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to xinha-discussion@... 
> > .  Please contact xinha-discussion-manager@... for  
> > questions.
> >
> 

Excerpts from Raimund Meyer's message of Wed Nov 26 09:26:33 -0500 2008:
> OK,  I have received an interesting opinion about the topic in a private 
> mail that makes me withdraw my proposal.  But  still I'd  like  to have  
> something to show this version is next generation. Maybe we could adopt 
> the fashionable practice of having a fancy codename?
> 

+1 on the codename. Ideas of what it could be? Hercules, perhaps? ;)

-Nick


> Raimund Meyer schrieb:
> > I have been thinking about calling the next version 1.0 or even 2.0 
> > (to be bold) instead of 0.96 to reflect our recent advancement. What 
> > do you think?
> >
> > ray
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Archive: 
> > http://www.openplans.org/projects/xinha/lists/xinha-discussion/archive/2008/11/1227122139743 
> >
> > To unsubscribe send an email with subject "unsubscribe" to 
> > xinha-discussion@....  Please contact 
> > xinha-discussion-manager@... for questions.
> >
>